As we step into 2023, the realm of smartwatches presents us with two formidable contenders: the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic and the TicWatch Pro 5. Choosing between them can be a challenging task, but worry not, as we’re here to provide you with a comprehensive comparison.
In this review, we’ll scrutinize and compare these two smartwatches in various aspects, including design, build quality, display, battery life, features, software, health tracking capabilities, and price to help you pick up the one that covers your needs. Check out the latest prices here: the TicWatch Pro 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic.
- Read also:
- Fossil Gen 6 Smartwatch Review
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro Review:
- Top 15 Best Smartwatches:
Design and Build Quality:
Let’s begin with design and build quality, which sets the stage for our comparison. The TicWatch Pro 5 retains the design DNA of its predecessors while introducing a fresh Sandstone finish, although it’s primarily a change in color rather than texture. The watch’s case is constructed from durable materials, featuring high-strength nylon with fiberglass that meets military-grade standards. The display is protected by Gorilla Glass 5, ensuring robustness.
In contrast, Samsung elevates the design game with the GW6 Classic. It also adheres to military-grade standards but takes it a notch higher with a stainless steel frame and sapphire crystal guarding the display. What truly sets it apart is the innovative rotating bezel, enhancing user interaction and navigation. While the TicWatch Pro 5 boasts a rotating crown, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic’s bezel offers an unparalleled user experience.
Both watches are water-resistant, but Samsung’s design and build quality take the lead, making it the clear winner in this category.
Display:
Moving on to the display, a crucial factor in the smartwatch experience. Both watches offer impressive displays, but their implementations differ significantly.
The TicWatch Pro 5 adopts a dual-display approach, combining a vibrant AMOLED display with a low-power FSTN (Film Compensated Super Twisted Nematic) display for basic wristwatch functionality. This ingenious concept offers several advantages, including efficient always-on functionality, excellent visibility in direct sunlight, and suitability for workouts. However, it sacrifices a bit of vibrancy and peak brightness when compared to the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic. The TicWatch Pro 5 features an AMOLED display with a resolution of 466×466 pixels and a 1.43-inch diameter.
In contrast, the GW6 Classic boasts a slightly larger 1.5-inch display with a higher resolution of 480×480 pixels. What truly sets it apart is its exceptional brightness, with a peak brightness of 2,000 nits, making it visible even in the brightest outdoor conditions. In this category, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic stands out as the clear winner.
Battery Life:
Now, let’s delve into battery life, a crucial factor for any smartwatch user. The TicWatch Pro 5 shines in this department, claiming the title of the best Wear OS device for battery life. Equipped with a substantial 628mAh battery, it consistently delivers over two days of usage, even with features like the always-on FSTN screen, 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, sleep tracking, stress measurement, and various apps.
Conversely, the GW6 Classic falls short in terms of battery endurance. It offers just over 250mAh, considerably less than the TicWatch Pro 5. Despite advancements in Wear OS for battery optimization, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic struggles to match the battery life of its predecessor, lasting only about a day.
Features:
Now, let’s explore the features offered by these smartwatches. Both devices provide a wide range of features, including stable Wi-Fi connections, Bluetooth technologies, NFC for payments, heart rate tracking, and weather updates. While the TicWatch Pro 5 lacks an LTE variation for phone calls, it compensates with a highly responsive processor.
Nevertheless, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic takes the lead in this category. It features a dual-core system-on-chip, providing better performance and smoother navigation, thanks to its innovative rotating bezel. It also boasts faster Bluetooth and Wi-Fi chips, making it a more versatile and capable device.
The Galaxy Watch 6 Classic even goes a step further, offering blood pressure and ECG tracking, albeit with varying levels of accuracy and limited availability depending on the region and compatible smartphones. Despite some restrictions, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic’s advanced features earn it a win in this category.
Software:
Let’s delve into the software aspect of these smartwatches. The TicWatch Pro 5 runs on Wear OS 3.5, granting access to the Play Store with thousands of apps, including popular ones like Maps, Spotify, Strava, and Shazam. The watch’s robust processor ensures smooth app performance. Additionally, TicWatch includes proprietary apps like Tick Oxygen and Tick Poles for health tracking.
While Wear OS has historically lacked customization options, it’s gradually improving. Furthermore, Google Assistant is easily accessible and functions well in most regions.
The Samsung GW6 Classic offers a different software experience. It runs on Wear OS 4.0 but integrates with Samsung Health, Bixby, and other Samsung-specific features. Its standout feature is the rotating bezel, enhancing user interface navigation. It also offers a broader selection of watch faces and seamless integration with Samsung smartphones, especially the Galaxy S line.
The choice between the two software ecosystems depends on your preferences. The TicWatch Pro 5 provides a more stock Android experience, while the GW6 Classic offers a polished Samsung experience.
- Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: How To Make The Right Choice
- Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Series 9: Should Ultra And Series 8 Users Upgrade?
- Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic
Smartphone Apps:
When it comes to smartphone apps, both watches offer their respective applications. The TicWatch app features a sleek design and offers various functions and configuration options. It provides insights into your health statistics and helps you better understand your body. However, it lacks certain features like music and picture transfer to the watch.
In contrast, the Galaxy Wearable app supports only the Galaxy Watch series but offers a comprehensive suite of features. It enables easy music and picture transfer and provides well-presented health data, albeit through several fragmented apps. While the app’s fragmentation may seem daunting at first, users can adapt to it over time. Health Tracking, Price, Pros, And Cons In The NEXT PAGE…
